art-274

art-274

So where can one go to determine the true essence of painting as an art? How can one define it? Is it the artists depiction of their soul on a canvas that creates the masterpiece?
Is it technical skill and classical styles that create the great masterpieces or just common earthly beauty depicted through the artists vision? These questions have reverberated throughout history
and now they plague us again.

ART has not always been what we think it is today. An object regarded as Art today may not have been perceived as such when it was first made, nor was the person who made it necessarily regarded as
an artist. Both the notion of `art` and the idea of the `artist` are relatively modern terms.

Many of the objects we identify as art today — Greek painted pottery, medieval manuscript illuminations, and so on — were made in times and places when people had no concept of `art` as we
understand the term. These objects may have been appreciated in various ways and often admired, but not as `art` in the current sense.

ART lacks a satisfactory definition. It is easier to describe it as the way something is done — `the use of skill and imagination in the creation of aesthetic objects, environments, or experiences
that can be shared with others`rather than what it is.